Archives for May 2020

What Does My Employer Have To Provide To Allow Me To Work From Home?

If your employer has arranged for teleworking to facilitate social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the employer must still meet its obligations to provide a lawful working environment for you and other employees. For example, even when you are teleworking, your employer must still provide a working environment where you are not subjected to unlawful discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

Further, when you work from home, your employer must also implement any applicable disability accommodations you may need. For example, if your employer had provided you adaptive equipment to facilitate working with a disability, you are entitled to the same or a comparable accommodation when you work from home.

In addition to anti-discrimination and disability laws, your employer must also comply with any labor laws applicable to your position. You remain entitled to overtime pay (if overtime laws apply to your job) for any overtime work you perform while working from home. You may be entitled to meal and rest breaks free from any work responsibilities, and you should be paid for all time worked. Your employer should set out clear goals for your teleworking arrangement, so you always know what is expected of you in terms of your working hours. Even if you are an “exempt” employee for whom many of the laws governing working hours do not apply, your new teleworking arrangement cannot incidentally change your job responsibilities so that you are required to perform non-exempt job functions without additional compensation.

From a practical standpoint, if your company sends you home and you need to augment your home office with equipment and supplies that you would normally have at work, you may be entitled to reimbursement for any out-of-pocket expenses you incur while you are teleworking. Many employers may offer to provide essential equipment, but, if they do not, they cannot pass the cost of doing business onto their employees.

Every situation is different, whether or not an employer has met its legal obligations to provide a lawful working environment for a teleworking employee will depend on the details. If you think your employer has not met its obligations to provide you an appropriate working environment for teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic, you should contact an experienced labor and employment attorney who can assess the facts of your situation.

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

I’m Pregnant During a Pandemic. How Can I Protect Myself and My Unborn Baby?

Pregnancy is one of the most exciting, and stressful, times in a person’s life, with your health and the health of your baby likely topping the list of your daily concerns. Throw in a global pandemic, and what is typically stressful becomes downright scary.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) says “there are currently no data showing that COVID-19 affects pregnant people differently than others” and that “[m]other-to-child transmission of COVID-19 during pregnancy is unlikely.” The CDC, however, also recognizes much is still unknown about COVID-19, pregnant people generally have “a higher risk of severe illness when infected with viruses that are similar to COVID-19,” and “after birth, a newborn can be infected after being in close contact with an infected person, including the baby’s mother or other caregivers.” As such, the CDC lists pregnant people as one of the categories of “People Who Need Extra Precautions” to reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19.

So, what can you do to protect yourself and your baby if you are considered an essential worker and have to report to work? Luckily, if your employer has at least 5 employees, California’s Pregnancy Disability Leave Law (“PDLL”) provides you with several options.

You Are Entitled To Reasonable Accommodations Advised by Your Health Care Provider

The PDLL entitles you to reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. Reasonable accommodations can include things like modifying work practices and policies, such as work-from-home policies, and transfers to less hazardous or strenuous positions or job duties if your employer can do so without it causing an undue burden on its operations. Arguably, many jobs once considered safe are now potentially hazardous due to the risks of exposure to COVID-19. As such, you may need to work from home, granted you can perform your essential job functions remotely, or you may need to temporarily transfer to a less hazardous position to avoid the risk.

But there is one catch – the accommodation must be requested with the advice of a health care provider. Therefore, make sure you discuss your specific work circumstances with your doctor –describe your work space, the number of people in that space, the health and safety precautions (or lack thereof) being taken by your employer, whether you regularly come in contact with third parties such as customers or medical patients, and whether any other employees have been diagnosed with COVID-19 – so that your doctor can make a fully informed decision about what accommodation is medically advisable given your medical and pregnancy history.

Then, inform your employer of the accommodation you are requesting, including providing a written doctor’s note if requested. Whether you are entitled to any particular accommodation will depend upon the circumstances of your pregnancy-related disability and your workplace.

You Can Take Protected Leave if, in the Opinion of Your Health Care Provider, You Are Disabled by Pregnancy

The PDLL also provides you with the right to take up to four months of protected leave if you are disabled by pregnancy, meaning, in the opinion of your doctor, you either cannot perform the essential functions of your job because of your pregnancy or because doing so would cause undue risk to yourself or your pregnancy’s successful completion. A non-exhaustive, illustrative-only list of conditions that may qualify as disabling include gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia.

Given that so much remains unknown about COVID-19’s effects on pregnancy, and that pregnant people generally have a higher risk of severe illness when infected with similar viruses, you should discuss your particular work circumstances with your doctor to determine whether a leave of absence is medically advisable. This may be the case where, for example, you are unable to perform your essential job functions from home or where your employer is unable to temporarily transfer you to a less hazardous position. But your employer cannot force you to take leave. So, if you request an accommodation, for example, to work from home based on the advice of your doctor and you are able to perform the essential functions of your job from home, your employer cannot force you to take leave instead of providing the accommodation.

Again, whether you are entitled to leave will depend upon the circumstances of your pregnancy-related disability and your workplace.

Your Rights While Being Accommodated or While on Leave

If you take leave or are temporarily transferred to a less hazardous position, your employer must reinstate you to your original job, or a comparable job with the same duties, skills, pay, and benefits, once you are no longer disabled by pregnancy. Further, while you are on protected leave, you will continue to be covered by any group health coverage your employer already provides. Though your employer is not required to pay you while you are out on leave, you have the option of using any accrued vacation or sick time. You may also be eligible for State Disability Insurance, which would provide you with 60 or 70% of your normal weekly wages.

Finally, it is important to know that it is illegal for your employer to fire, demote, harass, or otherwise discriminate against you because of your pregnancy, or to retaliate against you for requesting accommodations or leave, regardless of whether the request was granted. You can obtain more information on your pregnancy disability rights, including reasonable accommodations and protected leave, from California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

What To Do if You Believe Your Rights are Being Violated

If you are pregnant and believe your employer is violating your rights, you may be able to hold them legally accountable. The employment law attorneys of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP will work with you to learn about your situation and seek fair and just compensation if your employer is breaking the law. Contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 to learn more about how we may be able to support your claim.

​Unlawful Driver’s License Discrimination

California law forbids several forms of driver’s license discrimination. These include requiring a driver’s license when unnecessary or using the information on a driver’s license to discriminate against an applicant or employee. Anyone who believes they suffered driver’s license discrimination should immediately reach out to an employment lawyer.

Can an Employer Require a Driver’s License?

As a general matter, employers cannot require a driver’s license unless a license is necessary to perform the applicable job duties. In more specific contexts, employers and other businesses that cater to the public cannot discriminate against Californians who hold driver’s licenses but cannot prove citizenship or lawful residence in the United States. They cannot discriminate against applicants or employees whose driver’s licenses accurately reflect their gender identity.

General Prohibition on Driver’s License Discrimination

In general, your employer may not require you to possess or present a valid driver’s license as a condition of employment. Employers may ask for a valid driver’s license if state or federal law otherwise requires one. An employer may have a policy requiring a driver’s license, but only if it applies the policy uniformly and if having a license is related to a legitimate business purpose.

A company cannot request a driver’s license from certain applicants but not others due to reasons not relating to the job duties in question. For example, a company cannot request a driver’s license from applicants with foreign-sounding names during the application stage but forgo the driver’s license requirement for other applicants.

This constitutes driver’s license discrimination and violates California employment laws.

Driver’s License Discrimination as a Form of National Origin Discrimination

Regarding national origin discrimination, Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue an original driver’s license to an otherwise qualified applicant – even if the applicant cannot prove their lawful presence in the United States under federal law. The same law makes it illegal to discriminate against someone who “holds or presents” such a license.

Under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), national origin discrimination includes – but is not limited to – discrimination due to possessing a driver’s license granted under Section 12801.9. If an employer can lawfully require an employee to have a valid driver’s license, the employer cannot refuse to accept a license issued under Section 12801.9 or treat an employee differently because they have such a license.

The Unruh Civil Rights Act prevents businesses open to the public from discriminating against anyone who holds a driver’s license issued under Section 12801.9. The Unruh Act applies to bars, restaurants, hotels, landlords, real estate agents, and many other business establishments. It can violate the Unruh Act for a covered business establishment to refuse service to a person holding a non-citizen driver’s license or even to charge that person a different rate for goods or services.

Driver’s License Discrimination as a Form of Gender Discrimination

Beginning in January 2019, Californians can opt to select an X (instead of an M or an F) as a gender nonbinary marker on their driver’s licenses. It can violate FEHA or the Unruh Act if an employer or public business discriminates against a person who chose to have an X driver’s license. California law broadly forbids discrimination due to gender and gender identity against applicants or employees, including discrimination due to someone’s appearance or what is on their driver’s license.

Further, an employer cannot discriminate against an employee whose gender on their driver’s license does not match their appearance. Discrimination cannot happen due to someone’s gender expression or nonconformity.

Discrimination can be overt and easy to recognize, such as a car rental company refusing to rent a car to a person with an X or Section 12801.9 license. It can also be subtle and difficult to discern, such as where an employer refuses to hire a person who holds one of those licenses for a job where a license is a requirement, even though that person is the best-qualified candidate.

What to Do if You Think You Experienced Driver’s License Discrimination?

If you believe you suffered driver’s license discrimination as a job applicant or employee, you should not wait to discuss what happened with an employment attorney. A lawyer can review your situation and advise whether you have legal rights under state discrimination laws.

Accusing an employer of failing to hire or otherwise discriminating against you due to your driver’s license information or failing to have a driver’s license can start a challenging battle. Employers will not admit to such discrimination, and they will come up with another pretextual reason for the adverse action. Your attorney can gather evidence to challenge this pretext and prove discrimination occurred.

An employment attorney can also identify what legal relief you deserve for your driver’s license discrimination and take steps to obtain this relief for you.

An Experienced Employment Discrimination Attorney Can Help

Whether or not an action is unlawfully discriminatory will depend on the facts and circumstances of a given situation. If you feel you suffered discrimination because of a failure to have a driver’s license or because of what is on your driver’s license, contact an experienced attorney who can advise whether an employer violated your rights.

If I’m Making More On Unemployment Than I Did At My Job, Should I Still Go Back To Work?

Following the passage of the CARES Act, millions of Americans have received the help they desperately needed during this economic crisis.  As mentioned in more detail in our previous blog entry, one of the primary benefits of the CARES Act is that individuals are receiving an additional $600 a week through the end of July.  As a result of this “unemployment on steroids”, many individuals are now earning more through unemployment than they did at their jobs.  When, and if, these employers ask employees to come back to work, employees are pondering whether they should stay on unemployment or take the job, and the pay cut.  While many are crying foul, the long-term incentive of employment likely trumps the short term “windfalls” of temporary assistance.

The minimum wage in California is $13 an hour for employers with more than 26 employees and $12 an hour for employers with less than 26 employees.  An employee who earns $13 an hour and works 40 hours a week, earns $520 a week and $27,040 annually.  In California, unemployment benefits are calculated by dividing the sum of wages earned during the highest quarter of an employee’s base period by 26, which means a minimum wage earner who only works 40 hours a week, would be entitled to $240 a week.  Previously, the maximum amount an employee could receive was $450 a week, but with the CARES Act’s $600 addition, an employee can now receive a maximum of up to $1,050 a week, which means workers who earned between $12 – $24 an hour are now making more from unemployment benefits than their full time jobs.

On the surface, choosing between work and unemployment is an easy decision for these employees, but failing to come back to work could lead to major consequences.  Most importantly, refusing to resume a job that wants you back could disqualify you from receiving unemployment benefits altogether.  To be eligible for unemployment, you must be willing to accept “suitable work,” which  means work in the individual’s usual occupation for which the employee is reasonably fitted.  Accordingly, refusing to return to “suitable work” and subsequently being stripped of unemployment benefits could leave you with nothing.

Work is not “suitable,” however, if the “wages, hours, or other conditions of the work offered are substantially less favorable to the individual than those prevailing for similar work in the locality.”  Thus, if your wages are dependent on tips, such as restaurant servers, you may still be able to collect unemployment after refusing to return to your position if tips aren’t part of the compensation anymore.  Additionally, if the employment puts your “health, safety, and morals” at risk, it may not be considered “suitable employment.”  For example, if you believe your prospective employer is not following CDC guidelines to maintain a safe workplace, you may be able to refuse an offer of employment and continue receiving unemployment benefits.

The $600 unemployment benefit will expire on July 31, 2020, and Congress is unlikely to extend the benefit past this date.  When the benefit reverts back to the normal California amount on August 1, 2020, most earners will earn much less than their previous income.  By that time, it may be difficult to find work, as the Economic Policy Institute predicts unemployment to reach 15.6% by July. Currently, an unemployed Californian can only collect 39 weeks of unemployment.

Unemployment benefits also do not account for the added value of your employer’s benefits, especially health insurance, if those are also provided.  Indeed, employers typically pay the lion’s share of an employee’s health care premiums.  The cost of continuing health benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) will be pricy.  Altogether, healthcare and retirement benefits account for nearly 30% of an employee’s total compensation.

With the expanded Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), employers are incentivized to keep employees on their payroll.  Specifically, if an employer procures a PPP loan, that loan may be completely forgivable if the employer uses 75% of the loan for payroll.  Thus, employers have a fiscal interest in keeping employees on the payroll and putting them back to work.  Millions of employees, however, are reluctant to take their minimum wage jobs back, especially because many of those jobs barely kept the lights on anyway.  The pandemic is creating additional financial strain, including rising prices of goods (i.e., the meat industry) and families are incurring unique costs of keeping children at home 24/7.  Accordingly, many workers might find it beneficial to ask for a raise, as they now have some bargaining power.  Indeed, if an employer received a PPP loan and employees refuse to return to work, that employer will have extra money that it budgeted for payroll and will now have to go elsewhere, which may impact the employer’s eligibility for loan forgiveness.  Nevertheless, employees should be cautious when turning down “suitable work,” as they may be left high and dry during an economic depression.

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

Rest Breaks Must Be Free From All Work Duties

The California Labor Code requires employers to provide their employees with ten-minute rest breaks during the working day. Must those legally mandated rest breaks be free from all work duties? Yes, they must. During a rest break, employers must: (1) relieve employees of all duty; and (2) relinquish control over how the employees spend their time.

As to the first requirement, employers must relieve employees of all duties during a rest break. Employees cannot be required to hang around and pitch in if it gets busy, not even a little bit. Employees cannot even be required to stay “on call” during a rest break, whether that means keeping a walkie-talkie on, or staying near their cell phones in case they need to return to work before their ten-minute break is up.

The second requirement means that employees must have freedom to relax during their rest breaks. Because rest breaks are only ten minutes long, the freedom is not unlimited. An employer can usually require the employee to remain on the premises in order to avoid rest breaks stretching way beyond the ten-minute mark. By the same token, the employer cannot usually force the employees to spend their breaks in a windowless, stuffy “break room” when the employees might otherwise stretch their legs or sit somewhere pleasant.

Both of these rules apply to official and de facto conduct by the employer. If the employer has an official policy or rule that requires employees to stand by during breaks, that policy would violate California labor law. However, the employer does not need to have an official policy in place to violate the law. In reality, it is relatively rare for an employer to have such a blatant, “on paper” violation. Many employers maintain facially neutral policies that indicate employees are “free from all duty” during rest breaks, but reality proves otherwise. In some cases, the employers require the employees to work through their rest breaks; or to cut rest breaks short because of understaffing or poor management. In other cases, the employer might make the employees stay somewhere “out of sight” during rest breaks. In any case, that’s no excuse, and an employer who denies employees their rest breaks may be liable to those employees for unpaid wages and penalties.

Determining whether an employer has violated California labor law can be a tricky, fact-intensive question that requires analysis by an experienced labor and employment attorney. If you think your employer has denied you your right to rest breaks free of all duty and control, you should consult an attorney for advice.

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

Can My Employer Require Me To Take a COVID-19 Test?

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued new guidance to employers on April 23, 2020, that employers are allowed to test employees for COVID-19 before they enter the workplace.

The EEOC explained that the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) requires any mandatory medical tests of employees be “job-related and consistent with business necessity” and that “an individual with the virus will pose a direct threat to the health of others.

Therefore, an employer may choose to administer COVID-19 testing to employees before they enter the workplace to determine if they have the virus.”

In regard to the testing, the EEOC warned and reminded employers that:

  • Employers should ensure the tests are accurate and reliable.
  • Employers may consider the incidence of false-positives or false-negatives associated with a particular test.
  • Employers must remember that accurate testing only reveals if the virus is currently present, and a negative test result does not mean an employee will not acquire the virus later.
  • Employers need to remember that the ADA requires all medical information about employees must be stored separately from their personnel file and must limit the access to this confidential information.

That final point is crucial. The EEOC states that employers may maintain all medical information related to COVID-19 in existing medical files – they do not need to create new COVID-19 files. These medical files would include “an employee’s statement that he has the disease or suspects he has the disease, or the employer’s notes or other documentation from questioning an employee about symptoms.”

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

If you believe your employer is violating your rights at work during this time, reach out to the attorneys of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP. We are an employee and consumer advocacy firm with nationwide renown for fighting on behalf of workers’ and consumers’ rights.

If you think you may have a valid claim within our areas of practice, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 to request a free consultation where we can help you understand your potential next steps.

Translate »