Wrongful Termination

How Do You Know if Your Termination Was Unlawful?

Losing your job can have far-reaching implications for your life that can be difficult to overcome with ease or as quickly as you might like. When an employer terminates you from a job, and that termination was unlawful, your employer denied you your ability to continue earning and support your family based upon an unlawful cause, and you may be entitled to compensation. Loss of employment impairs present obligations while also limiting future earnings and can also cause mental anguish given the related stress.

Following is a consideration of wrongful termination so that you know whether you might have a case. If your situation sounds familiar, reach out to a lawyer to explore the strength of your case and the size of your prospective settlement.

Discrimination Is a Common Reason for Wrongful Termination

If an employer terminates you based discrimination in any form, whether based upon your race, gender, disability, or religion, they have wrongfully terminated you. In such a situation, it can be difficult to clearly determine that it is due to one of these factors that you were, in fact, terminated.

Employers or supervisors may provide alternative reasons for your termination; reasons meant to mask over the true reason given that it might be discriminatory. Firing employees based upon a discriminatory reason opens employers to lawsuits, and some savvy managers understand this and do their best to mitigate the risk by providing other reasons.

Should you have been fired for reasons outside of your work performance, or if the reasons do not make sense, you may have experienced discrimination, and thus a wrongful termination. An attorney can help you understand how the law applies to your unique facts and circumstances.

FMLA Protects Medical Leave, and Your Employer Cannot Terminate You During Protected Leave

Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, as explained by the Department of Labor, employees who work for covered organizations are entitled to take a 12-week leave from work when a qualifying condition has occurred. The qualifying conditions are, broadly speaking, family, health, and bonding with a new child. The family and health aspect means you must attend to a personal health emergency or one for a family member.

The new child qualification means your family has had a newborn, adopted a child, or is within the first year of placement with a foster child. During the 12 weeks, your employer must continue to provide your group health insurance, and after the 12 weeks, your employer must give you your job back.

If you have lost your job for applying for your rightful FMLA leave, or you have been denied your health benefits during or your job after, you may have a case. Reaching out to an attorney to discuss the facts of your case will help you understand what claims you might have and the settlement you might deserve.

Retaliation Is a Common Form of Unlawful Termination

According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the EEOC, retaliation is the most frequently alleged basis of discrimination that employees report within the federal sector and the most common finding of discrimination in federal sector cases.

The law prohibits employers from punishing job applicants or employees by asserting their rights to be free of workplace discrimination, including harassment. Asserting an EEO right is described as a “protected activity” under the EEO, and employers cannot retaliate against employees for asserting their rights.

Whether you have filed a complaint yourself or participated in an investigation concerning someone else’s complaint, an employer cannot rightfully fire you based on this alone. The law empowers employees to participate honestly in workplace investigations.

Firing an employee because they were honest concerning the harassment of a supervisor would likely lead to ongoing harassment, given the lack of punishment. An employer is also liable if they facilitate or fail to act against the harassing behavior of their employees.

An Employer Cannot Fire You for Protecting Yourself or Others from Discrimination or Harassment

The law prohibits employers from retaliating against employees or applicants for asserting their rights through engaging in protected activities. Participating as a filer or witness in an EEO charge, complaint, investigation, or lawsuit cannot be a viable reason for termination.

Answering questions within an employer investigation of harassment, communicating to a supervisor or manager about employment discrimination or harassment, resisting sexual advances, or protecting others from them are all unlawful reasons for termination.

If your employed fired you for exercising your rights against discrimination in the workplace or tried to protect others, your termination might not have been lawful. To recognize whether or not you have a case and the size of any compensation you might deserve, speaking with an attorney can help.

How do I know if my termination was wrongful or illegal?

Generally, an employer cannot terminate you for asserting your protected rights in the workplace, such as filing complaints about harassment or trying to prevent a coworker from discriminatory behavior.

Can I be terminated if I have to leave work for a family health emergency?

If you have exercised your FMLA leave rights with a covered employee and your employer terminated you for applying, your termination was wrongful.

How do I know if my termination was due to retaliation?

While the unique facts of your situation will determine your case, frequently, if an employer fires an employee after they exercised a protected right like filing a complaint or honestly answering questions in an investigation, the termination was wrongful.

How much can I recover for a case of wrongful termination?

If you have experienced wrongful termination, you may be entitled to compensatory damages like lost earnings and potentially punitive damages.

Who do I file my wrongful termination lawsuit with?

If you are looking to recover damages or compensation for your wrongful termination case, the jurisdiction for the case will vary depending upon the facts and circumstances of your case, and an attorney can help advise you on your options.

Can I Be Fired For Complaining About a Lack of Safety Precautions At Work?

As we slowly transition from the new normal back to the old normal, we cannot forget that we are still very much in the midst of a global pandemic. Although cases have waned in California (for now), our state still tallies thousands of new cases every day. As we learned in June, this is not the time to throw caution to the wind.

Unfortunately, your employer might not feel the same way. Many people are coming back to work and finding that their employers are not following the Federal and State-mandated precautions. Although these workers don’t feel comfortable in such a dangerous work setting, they also don’t feel comfortable stirring the pot and risk losing their jobs. After all, their employers might already be struggling after months of shutdowns, and an added safety complaint might cause their employer to retaliate. Fortunately, employees who bring these safety concerns to their employer are protected from retaliation under California law.

California Labor Code §6310 prohibits retaliation against any employee who makes “any oral or written complaint to … his or her employer” relating to the employee’s health or safety.[1] Employees who prevail on a retaliation claim under §6310 are entitled to reinstatement and back pay, and these claims may be brought as a private right of action. Simply put, California employees can make complaints to their employers about health and safety concerns without fearing losing their job over this complaint. If they are terminated, they can file a lawsuit, and if successful, can be reinstated back in their position and receive backpay. Even if the complaint is not based on an actual health and safety violation, employees are still protected, so long as they complain in good faith about their working conditions.[2]

If an employee blows the whistle to a government or law enforcement agency, or anyone “with authority over the employee” regarding a safety violation under law, such as violating the State’s executive orders relating to COVID-19, workers are further protected from retaliation under California Labor Code §1102.5(b). Similarly, Labor Code 1102.5(a) prohibits employers from preventing their employees from disclosing safety concerns which the employee reasonably believes to be a violation of law.

California law provides many protections for employees who do not feel safe at work. While we all want to go back to normal, we must all recognize that COVID-19 is still here and we must remain vigilant. Fortunately, concerned employees are protected from retaliation.

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP is here to help employees fight for their rights if they experienced retaliation for speaking up about unsafe or unsanitary working conditions. If you were punished for speaking up about not feeling safe at work, especially within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may be able to help you fight for fair and just compensation.

Reach out to our attorneys today for a free consultation by contacting us online or calling (619) 342-8000.

 


 

[1] See Cal. Lab. Code §6310(a)(1).

[2] Hentzel v. Singer Co., 138 Cal. App. 3d, 290, 299-300 (1982).

Can I Be Fired For Requesting an Accommodation To Take Care of Children Who Are Now At Home?

Under the newly enacted Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), some employees are allowed to take up to 12 weeks of continuous or intermittent leave to care for their child because their child’s school has shut down and such employees cannot be fired for taking such leave.

The FFCRA requires private employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide employees who have been employed for more than 30 days with up to 12 weeks of Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) leave if the employee cannot come to work, or telework, to care for a minor child whose school or child care is closed or unavailable due to COVID-19. Section 5104 of the FFCRA prohibits employers from discharging, disciplining, or discriminating against employees who take this type of leave under the FFCRA.

California law also requires employers who employ more than 25 employees to provide up to 40 hours of leave to parents, guardians, stepparents, foster parents and grandparents, who give advance notice to their employer, to care for their children during a “school emergency.” A “school emergency” includes when a child cannot return to school due to a “national disaster….” One could reasonably argue the pandemic qualifies as a “national disaster,” requiring an additional 40 hours of leave on top of the leave provided under the FFCRA. Importantly, California employers are prohibited for discharging or discriminating against their employees for taking this type of leave.

If Your Employer Has More Than 500 Employees

For employees working for employers with more than 500 employees, an employer is not required to provide a reasonable accommodation for an employee simply because an employee’s child’s school is closed under the FFCRA. While Federal and California law require employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant or disabled employees, an employer is not required to provide a reasonable accommodation for employees to take care of their children just because schools or daycares have closed. Accordingly, there are no legal grounds to request this type of “reasonable accommodation” and therefore the law does not protect employees from being fired for requesting this accommodation.

If, however, an employee’s child suffers from a serious medical condition, where the parent must stay home to care for the child’s condition, the employee may be able to request an accommodation under the FMLA or under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) based on the employee’s association with her disabled child.

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

If you have any questions about your specific rights to leave, please feel free to contact Haeggquist & Eck, LLP for more information and to arrange a free consultation with one of our attorneys.

Get in touch with us today by filling out our online contact form or calling (619) 342-8000 for help.

Can I Be Fired For Joining the Black Lives Matter Protests?

Assuming you did it on your own time, the answer is no. Employees cannot be fired because they joined the Black Lives Matter protests, or for any other political activity in which they participate.

At the Federal level, and in many states, political affiliation is not one of the traditional “protected classes” of anti-discrimination law. California, however, is among a minority of states that protect political affiliation and activity from workplace discrimination. Although California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act does not prevent employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, under California Labor Code §§1101 and 1102, employers may not interfere with or control employees’ political activity.

California’s law protecting political activity dates back to the New Deal era and the organized labor movement, which was growing in political power at that time. But the law is not limited to protecting labor activism and organization. The California Supreme Court has interpreted the law expansively in the intervening years. Under the law, banding together with others in support of a cause can be protected “political activity”; as could expressing support for political reform by a symbolic gesture, such as wearing a pin or an armband, or displaying an appropriate banner.

Based on this interpretation of the law, an employee would be protected from retaliation for marching in a Black Lives Matter protest on his or her own time. The employer could not discriminate against the employee for tweeting about the movement; or for discussing the movement with coworkers during an employee’s rest break. If the employer’s dress code allows t-shirts, the employer could not discriminate against an employee who wore a Black Lives Matter t-shirt to work, and the same goes for pins, posters, or other emblems of the movement. An employee probably cannot walk off the job in order to protest, but if the political activity is otherwise lawful and doesn’t interfere with the employee’s work, it should be protected.

Moreover, because the United States and California Constitutions both protect the right of the people to peaceably assemble and petition for a redress of grievances, terminating an employee for participating in a Black Lives Matter march might also violate the common law prohibition on terminating employees in violation of public policy. If your employer retaliates against you after finding out you joined in the Black Lives Matter protests, contact an employment attorney to protect your rights.

Of course, other, more conventional political activity is protected as well, and actions short of outright termination might also violate the law. For example, an employer could not prevent an employee from wearing a “Feel the Bern” t-shirt, assuming a t-shirt is otherwise allowed by the employer’s dress code. A manager cannot ridicule an employee for being among the tens of thousands of Americans who cast protest ballots for Mickey Mouse or Santa Claus. Without question, an employer cannot fire or threaten to fire an employee because that employee supports a particular cause or candidate. Similarly, an employer cannot refuse to hire a person based on that person’s political beliefs or affiliations.

In an extreme case, where political affiliation discrimination turns violent, California’s hate crime law, known as the Ralph Act, may offer employees even further protection. In California, verbal or written threats of violence, physical assault, graffiti, vandalism, and property damage can be considered hate crimes if motivated by, among other reasons, a person’s political affiliation. If

workplace discrimination on the basis of political affiliation turns violent, or potentially violent, an employer could be liable for failing to act on reports of workplace conduct that would violate the hate crime law.

If you think your employer’s actions may violate California laws protecting political affiliation, you should contact an experienced employment attorney who can assess your situation and advise you on how you might protect your right to political affiliation.

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

Prime v. Oliveira: A Rare Blow To Arbitration

On January 15, 2019, the US Supreme Court in Prime v. Oliveira issued a unanimous decision that the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) exemption for “contracts of employment” now applies to independent contractors.  Prior case law simply applied this exemption to employees, but now the Supreme Court expanded the exemption to all transportation-type workers, including independent contractors. In other words, all transportation workers, whether an employee or independent contractor, are exempt from the FAA – the predominant statute employers use to compel arbitration.

As mentioned in previous blog entries, arbitration agreements eviscerate important legal rights a party has in court, and arbitration is no faster or cheaper than a matter you would see in a courtroom.  Instead, arbitration agreements load the deck for employers; thus, more and more employers include arbitration provisions in their employment/independent contractor agreements.  In fact, the use of arbitration agreements by private companies has exploded from 2 percent in 1992 to more than 55 percent in 2018.  While arbitration clauses are certainly on the rise, this ruling is a clear win for the plaintiff employee who seeks to vindicate her rights in court.

However, this is not to say transportation employees are completely immune to dastardly arbitration clauses.  Generally, the FAA, a federal act, preempts state arbitration laws. Now, transportation employees’ and independent contractors’ fight against arbitration will be waged using the applicable state law.  Fortunately, several state laws frown upon arbitration clauses (California bans arbitration clauses for wage claims, Montana prohibits arbitration clauses for workers’ compensation claims, and New Hampshire contains restrictions on employment arbitration), and a few states completely prohibit arbitration clauses in employment contracts (Iowa, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Rhode Island).  Indeed, the individual states are a potpourri of laws regarding arbitration and the results will undoubtedly be a mixed bag.

Nevertheless, this ruling is a win, albeit small, for employees, especially following a Supreme Court ruling which emboldened employers seeking arbitration.  The strongest obstacle to defeating arbitration clauses, the FAA, is no longer impeding the rights of transportation workers, whether they are employees or independent contractors.

If you have been harassed, discriminated against, wrongfully terminated, or otherwise wronged by your employer, and feel you might be hauled in arbitration, please contact us online or call us at (619) 342-8000.

Four Haeggquist & Eck Attorneys Named California Super Lawyers; Alreen Haeggquist Named To Top 25 Women, Top 50 Attorneys Lists

We’re thrilled to announce that Haeggquist & Eck attorneys Alreen Haeggquist, Amber Eck, Aaron Olsen, and Jenna Rangel have been selected to the 2019 California Super Lawyers list.  Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers statewide are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Haeggquist, the firm’s founding partner, was also selected for inclusion in the Top 25 Women San Diego Super Lawyers list and the Top 50 San Diego Super Lawyers list.

In addition, senior associate Jenna Rangel has been selected to the 2019 California Rising Star list.  No more than 2.5 percent of lawyers in California receive this honor each year.

Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.  The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area.  The result is a credible, comprehensive, and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

Please join us in congratulating Alreen, Amber, Aaron, and Jenna for this incredible honor!

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

Translate »