Archives for September 19, 2023

What are the signs of retaliation in the workplace?

The law provides certain rights to you as an employee, allowing you to exercise these rights without fear of retaliation in the workplace.Ā 

Unfortunately, many employers engage in retaliation by intimidating or punishing employees for actions that are legally protected.

Recognizing when retaliation occurs is crucial for safeguarding your rights and understanding the signs of unfair treatment.

Employment laws are designed to prohibit employer retaliation and protect employees who take action under the law.Ā 

Despite this, some employers conduct unlawful activities, hoping employees do not realize their rights have been violated.

Understanding these protections is essential, particularly in an at-will employment state where employers can terminate workers without substantial cause.

If you suspect unlawful retaliation by your employer, whether through a pattern of behavior or an isolated incident, seek immediate help from a San Diego workplace retaliation lawyer. It’s vital to address any signs of workplace retaliation promptly.

Schedule a Free Initial Evaluation Today!

Overview of Workplace Retaliation

Workplace retaliation refers to adverse actions taken by an employer against an employee in response to engaging in protected employee activities, such as:

  • Reporting discrimination based on race, gender, or national origin, harassment, safety violations, income violations, or other illegal practices of an employer

  • Participating in internal investigations or cooperating with government agency investigations regarding employer conduct

  • Asserting rights granted by employment law, including taking valid family medical leave or filing a workers’ compensation claim

  • Refusing to engage in unlawful conduct at the request of your employer

Understanding these dynamics is crucial, especially in an at-will employment state where termination can occur without explicit reasons.

Forms of Retaliation

Retaliation can manifest in many forms, including:

  • Termination

  • Demotion

  • Salary reduction or pay cuts

  • Negative performance reviews

  • Increased workload or shift lengths

  • Fewer shift offerings

  • Exclusion from meetings

  • Threats

  • Sexual advances or harassment

  • Other adverse changes in work conditions

Even subtle actions that create a hostile work environment, discriminatory workplace culture, or deter employees from exercising their legally protected rights can be considered retaliatory. A reasonable person might perceive these measures as unfair treatment.

Several Laws Prohibit Retaliation

Several federal and state laws protect employees from retaliation, including:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

  • The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)

  • The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

These laws are intended to provide a safeguard against retaliation.

Steps to Prove Retaliation

Establishing a retaliation claim is crucial for employees who suspect they have been targeted for asserting their legal rights. Understanding the steps involved in proving such a claim can empower employees to take necessary actions.Ā 

Hereā€™s how you can demonstrate that retaliation in the workplace has occurred:

  • Engaging in a Protected Activity: Begin by showing you participated in a legally protected activity, such as reporting discrimination, harassment, or safety violations.

  • Experiencing an Adverse Action: Demonstrate that you faced negative consequences directly resulting from your protected activity, like termination, demotion, or pay cuts.

  • Demonstrating a Causal Link: Establish a connection between your protected activity and the adverse action, often by showing the negative action closely followed the protected activity, indicating a retaliatory intent.

  • Documenting Evidence: Keep detailed records of all incidents related to the retaliation, including emails, performance reviews, and witness statements.

  • Seeking Legal Guidance: Consult with an employment lawyer to evaluate your claimā€™s strength and navigate the legal process effectively. A lawyer can assist in gathering evidence, filing complaints, and pursuing compensation.

By thoroughly documenting your experiences and understanding the legal framework, you can strengthen your retaliation claim. Legal guidance is essential in ensuring your rights are upheld and you receive fair treatment in the workplace.

Legal Recourse

Employees who experience retaliation can file a complaint with relevant government agencies, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or pursue civil claims against the employer for compensation and other legal remedies.Ā 

This process may address lost wages, undue hardship, and potential constructive termination.

Seeking legal advice from an employment attorney is crucial if you face retaliation. An attorney can assess the situation, provide guidance on protecting rights, and help pursue remedies if retaliation occurred.Ā 

They ensure you remain free from employment discrimination and address any possible violation of your rights.

How to Identify Workplace Retaliation

Even if you understand your rights against retaliation, recognizing it when it happens can be challenging. Employers often disguise retaliation as justified action, making it more difficult for a reasonable employee to protect themselves.

Here are signs that your employer may have engaged in retaliation:

  • Adverse employment action shortly after a protected activity: If an employer punishes you through a demotion, suspension, transfer, or termination shortly after you engage in a protected activity, call a lawyer.

  • Negative performance reviews after protected activities: Receiving disproportionately negative performance reviews or sudden negative feedback can indicate retaliation.

  • Change in general treatment: A sudden change in how your supervisor or colleagues treat you, such as exclusion from meetings or isolation, after engaging in protected activities can suggest retaliation.

  • Reduced job responsibilities or pay cut: Experiencing reduced job responsibilities, opportunities for advancement, or pay cuts may indicate retaliation.

  • Unwarranted disciplinary action: Facing unwarranted disciplinary actions, write-ups, or increased scrutiny can indicate retaliation.

  • Repeated negative feedback: Receiving repeated negative feedback without valid reasons can raise concerns of retaliation.

  • False accusations: Being falsely accused of wrongdoing or facing unfounded allegations can signify retaliation.

  • Loss of privileges or benefits: Experiencing a sudden loss of privileges, benefits, or assignments may suggest retaliation.

  • Isolation or ostracism: Experiencing isolation from colleagues or exclusion from projects can indicate retaliation.

  • Inconsistent treatment: Observing inconsistent treatment compared to co-workers who did not engage in similar protected activities can be a sign of retaliation.

Any action your employer takes to incite workplace retaliation that damages your work environment, career prospects, or well-being due to your protected activities can constitute a violation of the law.

This could include measures like increasing shift lengths, altering overtime opportunities, or demoting you to reduce your hourly wage.Ā 

How Employers Deny Unlawful Retaliation

Employers might engage in unlawful retaliation, knowing it violates the law. Recognizing the potential legal consequences, many employers take deliberate steps to deny or obfuscate instances of unlawful retaliation.

One way employers try to deny unlawful retaliation is by employing pretextual justifications for their actions. They may claim they took adverse actions, such as demotions or terminations, for legitimate reasons unrelated to the employee’s protected activity.

For instance, an employer might argue that an employee’s performance was subpar, despite having previously received positive evaluations. By presenting such justifications, employers create a narrative that shifts the focus away from the protected activity and onto alleged performance issues.

Another tactic employers use is to challenge the timing of events. They might argue that the adverse action was not a direct result of the employee’s protected activity, but rather a consequence of other factors occurring around the same time.

Employers also attempt to deny unlawful retaliation by isolating incidents and portraying them as isolated events without a broader pattern. This approach undermines the employee’s retaliation claims by ignoring the cumulative impact of these incidents.

In some cases, employers may resort to creating a hostile work environment to discourage employees from pursuing retaliation complaints or reporting workplace violations. They might subject the employee to increased scrutiny, micromanagement, or isolation, making their work environment uncomfortable and unbearable.

To further complicate matters, employers may insist on mandatory arbitration clauses as part of employment agreements. These clauses require employees to resolve disputes through private arbitration rather than pursuing legal action in court, limiting transparency and potential public accountability.

Recognizing and addressing these strategies is crucial in protecting employees from retaliation. If you are in this position, speak with an employment lawyer immediately.

How an Employment Lawyer Can Help with an Unlawful Retaliation Case

Knowledge of Labor Laws

Employment lawyers possess in-depth knowledge of federal, state, and local labor laws. They can educate you on your rights and guide you through the legal standards applicable to your situation.

Case Assessment

An employment lawyer will begin by assessing the viability of your retaliation case. They will review all pertinent facts and evidence to determine if your case meets the legal criteria for a claim.

Gathering Evidence

Building a strong case requires substantial evidence. Lawyers assist in gathering necessary documents, emails, and witness statements to support your claim.

Developing a Legal Strategy

Based on the case facts, employment lawyers formulate a legal strategy aimed at achieving the best possible outcome, whether through negotiation or litigation.

Handling Complaints Filed

Experienced attorneys ensure that complaints filed with relevant agencies are managed correctly, preventing any oversights that might lead to undue hardships.

Addressing Lost Wages and Damages

Part of their strategy includes seeking compensation for lost wages and any other financial or emotional damages resulting from retaliation.

Navigating Potential Violations

Employment lawyers can identify and address potential violations masked by seemingly lawful employer practices.

Ensuring Compliance with Protective Laws

They ensure your case is handled in accordance with laws intended to protect employees from retaliation.

Alreen Haeggquist, San Diego Employment Lawyer

Ā 

Alreen Haeggquist, San Diego Employment Lawyer

Seek Guidance: Connect with an Employment Lawyer for Workplace Retaliation Issues

A San Diego employment lawyer represents your interests when facing unlawful retaliation in the workplace. Their experience and advocacy can significantly influence the outcome of retaliation claims, helping to uphold your legal rights against employer retaliation and workplace discrimination.

If you notice signs of retaliation at work, itā€™s crucial to seek a legal consultation without delay. Taking action against a current or former employer can be challenging, but it is necessary to uphold your rights under both federal and state laws.

An employment lawyer can help navigate the complexities of filing complaints, negotiating settlements, or pursuing civil claims, ensuring that your grievances are properly addressed and that you receive any compensation due for lost wages or other damages.

Remember, you do not have to face these challenges alone. An experienced attorney can guide you through the process, providing the support and expertise needed to protect your interests and secure a fair and just workplace environment free from discrimination and retaliation.

Title IX Sex Discrimination Case Against SDSU Moves Forward Again: Court Holds All Women Athletes Can Sue For Damages, Future Discrimination Can Be BarredĀ 

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP is proud to co-counsel on this landmark case with Bailey & Glasser, LLP and Casey Gerry.  

Press Release from Bailey & Glasser: 

The precedent-setting Title IX sex discrimination case against San Diego State University for discriminating against its female-student athletes continues to move forward. On April 12, 2023, U.S. District Court Judge Todd W. Robinson confirmed female student-athletes deprived of equal athletic financial aid can sue their schools for damagesā€”and held ten of the women suing SDSU could do so. Late Friday afternoon, September 15, 2023, ruling on SDSUā€™s motion to dismiss in part Plaintiffsā€™ Third Amended Complaint, Judge Robinson held that all seventeen of the women suing SDSU can seek such damages.Ā 

The court also rejected SDSUā€™s argument that, because the case had already taken so long that the women are no longer student-athletes, they could not seek a court order stopping the school from discriminating in the future. It held that, if the case went forward as a class action, those who were student-athletes when the case was filed could also seek a court order protecting future student-athletes. 

ā€œThis is a huge victory for the women athletes and everyone who cares about stopping sex discrimination at SDSU and nationwide,ā€ said Arthur Bryant of Bailey Glasser, LLP, in Oakland, CA, lead counsel for the women. ā€œThe school has cheated its female student-athletes out of millions of dollars of equal athletic financial aid in the past few years aloneā€”and it still hasnā€™t changed its ways. Now, all the women who decided to stand up and fight can make SDSU pay. And the school wonā€™t be able to keep discriminating in the future just because itā€™s delayed judgment day so far. ā€œ 

ā€œThis critical ruling confirms what weā€™ve said all alongā€”these brave women deserve their day in court to hold SDSU accountable for its past discriminatory behavior and to prevent it from engaging in discriminatory behavior in the future,ā€ said Joshua Hammack of Bailey Glasser, LLP in Washington, DC, who took the lead in briefing and arguing the issues. ā€œThis order ensures Plaintiffs can pursue both goals in court, which is an important victory for them, for justice, and for women everywhere.ā€ 

ā€œWe hope and believe this ruling will make a big difference,ā€ said Plaintiff and former SDSU rower Natalie Figueroa. ā€œA key point of our suit is that women were not given an equal opportunity to receive athletic financial aid. That was discrimination. I and other female student-athletes could and would have gotten more aid if we were given an equal opportunity to do so.ā€ 

In addition to Figuero, the lawsuit was filed by past and then current SDSU student-athletes Madison Fisk, Raquel Castro, Greta Viss, Clare Botterill, Maya Brosch, Olivia Petrine, Aisha Watt, Helen Bauer, Carina Clark, Erica Grotegeer, Kaitlin Heri, Kamryn Whitworth, Sara Absten, Eleanor Davies, Alexa Dietz, and Larisa Sulcs. 

In addition to Bryant and Hammack, the women are represented by Bailey Glasserā€™s Lori Bullock in Des Moines, IA, and Cary Joshi in Washington, DC, along with co-counsel Amber Eck and Jenna Rangel of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, and David S. Casey, Jr., and Gayle Blatt of Casey Gerry in San Diego. 

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits all educational institutions that receive federal funds, including SDSU, from discriminating on the basis of sex. It requires schools to provide male and female student-athletes with equal participation opportunities, athletic financial aid, and treatment, and prohibits them from retaliating against anyone for challenging sex discrimination at the school. In the SDSU case, the women are suing for equal athletic financial aid, equal treatment, and retaliation. 

Translate Ā»