Haeggquist & Eck, LLP Files Consumer Fraud Class Action Against Trump University

April 30, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

San Diego, April 30, 2010 ā€“Ā Haeggquist & Eck, LLP,Ā and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLPĀ on April 30, 2010, filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit against Trump University, on behalf of consumers who purchased Trump University real estate investing seminars.

Trump University markets itself as a University driven by the mission to ā€œtrain, educate and mentor entrepreneurs on achieving financial independence through real estate investing.ā€ It is anything but. Indeed, in January 2010, the Better Business Bureau gave Trump University a D-minus rating, and the New York Department of Education recently demanded that Trump University remove ā€œUniversityā€ from its title, insisting that the ā€œuse of the word ā€˜universityā€™ by your corporation is misleading and violates New York Education Law and the Rules of the Board of Regents.ā€

The class-action lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleges that Trump University made materially misleading misstatements in its advertising and in its real estate seminars, in violation of federal and state law. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff and class members who attended Trump Universityā€™s real estate investing classes were promised a ā€œcomplete real estate education,ā€ a ā€œone-year apprenticeship,ā€ a one-on-one mentorship, practical and fail-safe real estate techniques, a ā€œpower teamā€ consisting of real estate agents, lenders, personal finance managers, property managers and contractors, and were assured that although the seminars cost as much as $35,000, they would make the money back in their first real estate deal, and could make up to tens of thousands of dollars per month or more. Plaintiff and class members did not receive what they bargained for.

The Complaint alleges that instead of receiving a ā€œcomplete real estate education,ā€ each seminar was merely an ā€œinfomercialā€ to up-sell the student to purchase an additional Trump Seminar. The ā€œone-year apprenticeshipā€ consumers were promised was actually just a 3-day seminar; the one-on-one year-long mentorship consisted of a 2-1/2 day excursion to view properties, and ā€œmentorsā€ recommended real estate deals in which they stood to financially benefit, and then quickly disappeared and failed to return calls.

ā€œOne of the most disturbing practices Trump University engaged in during these seminars was to tell students to raise their credit card limit ā€˜4 timesā€™ during the break, presumably to make real estate purchases,ā€ said Plaintiffā€™s attorney, Amber Eck ofĀ Haeggquist & Eck, LLP. ā€œIn fact, after students had raised their credit card limits, Trump University representatives told the students to use their newly increased credit limit ā€” not to purchase real estate ā€“ but to purchase the next Trump ā€œGoldā€ seminar ā€“ for $35,000.ā€

ā€œItā€™s really disappointing in this economy to see the lengths that Trump will go to play on the fears of seniors ā€“ cajoling, ā€˜How many of you lost a lot of your 401k investment in the market? How many of you are retired? How many of you want to leave a legacy or property to your kids?ā€ said Helen Zeldes of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP. ā€œPraying on peopleā€™s fears to sell them empty promises is not just wrong, itā€™s illegal.ā€

  • May 25, 2011 ā€“ CNN, ā€œIs Trump University a Scam?ā€œ
  • May 7, 2011 ā€“ Forbes, ā€œTrump Universityā€™s Unhappy Students.ā€
  • May 6, 2011 ā€“ The Huffington Post, ā€œTrumpā€™s ā€˜Universityā€™ Accused of Scamming Customers.ā€
  • May 5, 2011 ā€“ San Francisco Chronicle, ā€œTrumpā€™s Real Estate Courses Didnā€™t Deliver, Lawsuit Says.ā€
  • April 26, 2011 ā€“ The Trump University lawsuit was featured on NPRā€™s ā€œThese Daysā€ with Alison St. John and KPBS Legal Analyst Dan Eaton.
  • April 19, 2011 ā€“Ā NBC Nightly NewsĀ airs a story on Donald Trump, mentioning Trump University.
  • On October 12, 2010, the Southern District of California issued an Order upholding our first amended class action complaint against Trump University as to nearly all claims, including claims for breach of contract, false advertising, violation of Californiaā€™s Unfair Competition Law (finding Plaintiffs stated a claim that Trump Universityā€™s conduct was unlawful, unfair andā€¦ fraudulent) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), with leave to amend as to the other claims. AĀ Second Amended ComplaintĀ was filed on December 16, 2010.

If you wish to discuss or participate in this action or have any questions concerning your rights or interests, pleaseĀ contactĀ plaintiffā€™s counsel, Amber Eck atĀ (619) 342-8000Ā or clickĀ here.

SHARE

COMMENTS & DISCUSSIONS

Related Posts

w=2500

Federal Court Holds All Plaintiffs in Precedent-Setting Title IX Case Can Sue San Diego State University for RetaliationĀ Ā 

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP is proud to co-counsel on this landmark case with Bailey & Glasser, LLP and Casey Gerry  ...
Read More
Title IX sex discrimination case HAE

Title IX Sex Discrimination Case Against SDSU Moves Forward Again: Court Holds All Women Athletes Can Sue For Damages, Future Discrimination Can Be BarredĀ 

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP is proud to co-counsel on this landmark case with Bailey & Glasser, LLP and Casey Gerry.   ...
Read More
Court makes landmark decision in favor of student athletes in Title IX lawsuit

Sex Discrimination Case Against SDSU Moving Forward on All Counts: Equal Athletic Financial Aid, Retaliation, and Equal Treatment

SDSU Women Win Nationā€™s First Ruling that Female Student-Athletes Denied Equal Athletic Financial Aid Can Sue Their Schools for Damages ...
Read More
Translate Ā»