Sex Abuse

The Ethical Duty to Provide Accurate Legal Options for Survivors: A Call for Inclusion of Civil Justice

The ethical responsibility of professionals working with survivors of sexual assault extends far beyond their immediate scope of work. In research, advocacy, or providing services, those engaged in supporting survivors must not only ensure that the information they disseminate is accurate but must also make efforts to understand resources that may exist outside their expertise, particularly in legal contexts such as civil litigation. Failure to do so can perpetuate harmful misconceptions and ultimately disempower the survivors they aim to help.

One glaring issue that has emerged is the misrepresentation of civil litigation options for survivors of sexual assault. For instance, many nonprofit organizations or researchers have misled survivors into believing that civil justice is financially out of reach, claiming that attorneys’ fees are prohibitively expensive. This could not be further from the truth. Civil attorneys working on sexual assault cases often do so on a contingency basis, meaning survivors do not pay upfront costs or fees. Instead, the attorney assumes the financial risk, and survivors only owe a percentage of the settlement if they win the case. If the case is unsuccessful, the survivor owes nothing. This model allows survivors to seek justice without financial barriers, yet the opposite is often presented in public discourse.

It’s particularly troubling when reputable researchers, books, or websites dedicated to trauma survivors reinforce these false narratives, shutting down survivors’ access to a critical avenue for justice. This misinformation denies them not only potential financial reparations but also the opportunity to hold perpetrators accountable outside the criminal justice system. Civil litigation offers survivors a measure of control and closure that criminal cases often cannot.

Moreover, the exclusion of civil attorneys from important platforms exacerbates this problem. Conferences that bring together advocates, prosecutors, law enforcement, and other professionals dedicated to survivor justice often fail to include civil attorneys. These events, which are meant to provide comprehensive support for survivors, overlook the crucial role that civil litigation can play. Without this piece of the puzzle, survivors and advocates alike are left with a narrow, incomplete view of justice. It is not enough to support survivors through criminal proceedings and advocacy alone—civil litigation needs to be understood as an integral part of a survivor-centered justice strategy.

Advocacy groups, particularly those that have been established for decades, must take on the responsibility of educating their staff and the public about the full spectrum of legal options available to survivors. This includes incorporating civil law into their training programs, outreach, and support services. Advocacy groups should be training advocates on how to guide survivors through the process of civil litigation and offering connections to attorneys who specialize in this area.

Additionally, multidisciplinary groups that involve law enforcement, rape crisis centers, and other service providers must also include civil attorneys in their collaborations. A truly holistic approach to supporting survivors demands that every avenue of justice is explored and made accessible, not just those traditionally emphasized. The omission of civil litigation from these discussions perpetuates a self-centered model of advocacy, one that focuses more on the comfort zones of the professionals involved than on the needs of survivors.

Ultimately, those working in the field of survivor justice have an ethical duty to be informed about the full range of resources and options available to survivors. Providing incomplete or inaccurate information does not just mislead—it can actively harm the very people these professionals seek to protect. Survivor-centered justice requires the dismantling of these barriers to civil justice, ensuring that every survivor knows their options and has access to the full support they need and deserve.

Recognizing Denim Day: A Stand Against Sexual Violence

The Origins of Denim Day

Denim Day has its roots in a troubling 1998 Italian Supreme Court decision, which overturned a rape conviction because the victim wore tight jeans. The judges concluded that the jeans were so tight that the victim must have helped remove them, implying consent. This decision sparked immediate and widespread outrage. The following day, the women in the Italian Parliament came to work wearing jeans in solidarity with the victim and in protest against the court’s decision. This act of defiance launched the annual Denim Day, which has been recognized globally ever since.

Why Denim Day Matters

Denim Day serves as an annual reminder of the critical work still needed to combat victim-blaming and to support survivors of sexual assault. It highlights a pervasive culture that too often allows the clothes a person wears to be used as an excuse for sexual harassment and assault. By participating in Denim Day, individuals, organizations, and communities make a collective statement that there is no excuse and never an invitation to sexually harass or assault.

For law firms like ours, which represent survivors of sexual assault, Denim Day is particularly significant. It provides an opportunity to reinforce our commitment to supporting survivors, advocating for their rights, and working tirelessly to secure justice on their behalf. It’s a day to educate the public about the impact of sexual violence and to challenge the misconceptions that often surround these crimes.

The Haggquist & Eck Team Gets Results

We get you the results you need and provide legal advice through the whole court process. Don’t be unprepared when you could have one of the best legal teams out there to assist you. Reach out to us today to get your case evaluation.

SCHEDULE A FREE CASE EVALUATION

From a legal standpoint, Denim Day underscores the importance of understanding consent and the need to continually fight against the misconceptions that lead to victim-blaming in courtrooms. As attorneys, it is our duty to ensure that survivors feel heard, respected, and believed. We strive to create a legal environment where survivors can come forward without fear of judgment based on their appearance or any other superficial factors.

Supporting Survivors

Beyond legal advocacy, recognizing Denim Day is about standing with survivors. It’s about creating spaces where their stories are heard and validated. It’s also an opportunity to provide resources and support for those affected by sexual violence. We encourage everyone to educate themselves and others about these issues, to volunteer their time and resources to local support groups and crisis centers, and to advocate for policies that protect survivors and hold perpetrators accountable.

Conclusion

Denim Day is not just about remembering a misguided court ruling; it’s about continuously pushing for changes in how society views and handles cases of sexual assault. As we mark this day, let us renew our commitment to fight for a world where no individual ever has to fear that their words, their actions, or their clothing could be used against them in their most vulnerable moments. Let us wear denim, not just as a symbol, but as a promise to support and believe survivors, challenge harmful stereotypes, and work towards true justice.

Is It Discrimination If My Employer Doesn’t Use My Preferred Pronouns?

For anyone affected by sexual violence seeking help, please reach out to us. We, at Haeggquist & Eck, are here to fight for you, to advocate for your rights, and to support you through every step of your journey towards healing and justice.

Translate »