Employment Law

Can I Be Fired For Requesting an Accommodation To Take Care of Children Who Are Now At Home?

Under the newly enacted Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), some employees are allowed to take up to 12 weeks of continuous or intermittent leave to care for their child because their child’s school has shut down and such employees cannot be fired for taking such leave.

The FFCRA requires private employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide employees who have been employed for more than 30 days with up to 12 weeks of Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) leave if the employee cannot come to work, or telework, to care for a minor child whose school or child care is closed or unavailable due to COVID-19. Section 5104 of the FFCRA prohibits employers from discharging, disciplining, or discriminating against employees who take this type of leave under the FFCRA.

California law also requires employers who employ more than 25 employees to provide up to 40 hours of leave to parents, guardians, stepparents, foster parents and grandparents, who give advance notice to their employer, to care for their children during a “school emergency.” A “school emergency” includes when a child cannot return to school due to a “national disaster….” One could reasonably argue the pandemic qualifies as a “national disaster,” requiring an additional 40 hours of leave on top of the leave provided under the FFCRA. Importantly, California employers are prohibited for discharging or discriminating against their employees for taking this type of leave.

If Your Employer Has More Than 500 Employees

For employees working for employers with more than 500 employees, an employer is not required to provide a reasonable accommodation for an employee simply because an employee’s child’s school is closed under the FFCRA. While Federal and California law require employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant or disabled employees, an employer is not required to provide a reasonable accommodation for employees to take care of their children just because schools or daycares have closed. Accordingly, there are no legal grounds to request this type of “reasonable accommodation” and therefore the law does not protect employees from being fired for requesting this accommodation.

If, however, an employee’s child suffers from a serious medical condition, where the parent must stay home to care for the child’s condition, the employee may be able to request an accommodation under the FMLA or under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) based on the employee’s association with her disabled child.

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

If you have any questions about your specific rights to leave, please feel free to contact Haeggquist & Eck, LLP for more information and to arrange a free consultation with one of our attorneys.

Get in touch with us today by filling out our online contact form or calling (619) 342-8000 for help.

California Judge Grants Emergency Stay, Uber & Lyft Back off from Shutdown Threats

Mere hours before rideshare hailing apps Uber and Lyft were willing to go dark in California over a judge’s order to classify its drivers as employees, an appellate court granted the companies a temporary reprieve from following the order.

And so, the rides continued – along with the companies’ refusal to consider rideshare drivers – who use Uber and Lyft’s apps to make money as de facto taxi drivers – as anything more than independent contractors. The status quo means the companies aren’t required to observe many important employment laws in California that would otherwise protect drivers’ rights to minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, paid sick leave, and worker’s compensation.

What spurred Uber and Lyft’s threats to cease service in California was an Aug. 10 injunction ordered by a California court that would have compelled the companies to begin reclassifying their drivers in the state as full employees by Aug. 21. At issue were lawsuits brought against the companies in May, alleging that they were violating AB-5 – a newly passed state law that adds a more stringent clarification as to what makes an independent contractor an independent contractor. As plaintiffs argued, rideshare drivers didn’t fit the bill.

The appellate court’s stay on the injunction, however, is contingent upon the companies prevailing in both their appeal and a ballot initiative to repeal AB-5 in November. By Sept. 4, the CEOS of both Uber and Lyft are required to submit to the appellate court a 30-day implementation plan to comply with AB-5 and reclassify their independent contractors as full-fledged employees.

Should the companies fail in their endeavors, however, it’s possible that many drivers who use the apps to generate extra income may be kicked off the app as a virtual form of at-will termination. It’s also possible that Uber and Lyft may just make do on their original threats to cease service in California and even move their headquarters to states they deem more friendly to their business models.

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP fights for workers when their employment rights are violated. If you are currently classified as an independent contractor and believe you should be reclassified under the provisions of AB-5, we can help you fight for what you deserve.

Our employment law attorneys can help clients like you recover fair and just compensation in damages against your employer in a successful lawsuit. Learn more about how we can assist you and if an experience attorney believes you may have a valid claim by reaching out to us for a free consultation.

Take advantage of this complimentary meeting with our attorneys by scheduling yours today. Call Haeggquist & Eck, LLP for help at (619) 342-8000 or fill out our online contact form to get in touch.

Are You Getting Equal Pay? Here’s What To Do If You Have Doubts.

Women and people of color have been perpetually fighting for equal rights in the workforce. While great strides have been made in the last several decades, there are still many reasons why the fight for equality at work is far from over.

Unfortunately, one of those reasons is equal pay. Despite the federal Equal Pay Act of 1963 and California’s own legislation that bans wage discrimination on the basis of sex or race, women and people of color across the state and nationwide aren’t being paid the same as their white male coworkers when they work in substantially similar roles.

If you’ve ever wondered if you’re being paid an equal wage, there are a few ways you can find out. Read about a few of these ways below to determine if you might be underpaid.

Do Some Research Online

If you’re wondering if you’re being paid a fair wage, there are a few places online where you can easily compare what you make to self-reported data anonymously posted by others. Sites like Glassdoor and Payscale can help you determine how your wage or salary stacks against those reported by people with similar roles at other companies across the United States. You may even be able to find data from current or former coworkers at your company to get a more focused view of how well you’re being paid.

When you’re comparing rates, however, take into account unseen or unreported factors like how long someone may have been with the company, what kind of prior experience did they have before getting hired, and – if you’re looking at data from another state – how the cost of living can factor into disparities. That said, wide disparities in pay that can’t be easily explained are worth exploring.

Leverage Your Professional Network

Chances are you’re connected by one or two degrees to people who hold your title at a different company or have held it in the past. Asking these professionals what they would consider to be reasonable pay and benefits for the job is one way of doing a more direct and personal type of market research.

Talk With Your Coworkers

Perhaps the most direct way of figuring out whether or not you’re being paid a fair wage is to directly ask your coworkers what they make. This may be the hardest option to pursue because you are probably only likely to get an answer out of coworkers who feel comfortable sharing what they make.

Keep in mind that discussing your wages isn’t something your employer can punish you for doing, but you shouldn’t pursue an answer from a coworker who is unwilling to share their information.

What If I Find Out I’m Being Underpaid?

If you find out you are being paid much differently than coworkers who share substantially similar roles and experience to your own, you should consider reaching out to an employment law attorney for guidance on what to do next.

At Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, we can help you navigate the issues you may need to address in a meeting with your supervisor to discuss your pay at the company compared to your coworkers’. If it appears likely that your pay is artificially lower than your coworkers’ as a result of discrimination, and your company is unwilling to make necessary adjustments, our attorneys can advise you of next-step options for taking legal action.

By working with an employment lawyer from Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, you can recover the fair and just compensation you deserve from an employer who violated your right to equal pay.

For more information about how we can help, schedule a free consultation by calling (619) 342-8000 or by filling out our online contact form.

What Does My Employer Have To Do If an Employee Tests Positive For COVID-19?

Employers should be relying on the latest public health recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), as well as state and local public health authorities. According to the CDC’s guidance, if an employee tests positive for COVID-19, your employer should be taking the following actions.

Send Infected Employee Home

The infected employee should be immediately separated from other employees and sent home (or instructed to remain home). Such employees should not return to work until released by their medical provider and they should self-isolate as instructed by the CDC. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has confirmed infected employees, including those experiencing symptoms, may be sent home.

Identify & Send Home Employees Who Were in Close Proximity with the Infected Employee

The employer should identify and send home all individuals who worked in close proximity (within six feet) of the infected employee for a prolonged period (10 minutes or longer) during the 48 hours before the onset of the symptoms. The CDC provides that employees who worked closely with the infected worker should be instructed to proceed based on the CDC’s guidance. This includes staying home until 14 days after last exposure, maintaining social distance from others, and self-monitoring for symptoms (i.e., fever, cough, or shortness of breath). If you are an essential worker, however, see the section below discussing the CDC’s guidance.

Notify Employees of Positive COVID-19 Test Result

If an employee tests positive for COVID-19 during the pandemic, employers should inform employees that an employee has tested positive for COVID-19 but may not reveal the identity of such employee. Employers may notify affected employees in a way that does not reveal the personal health-related information of the infected employee. For example, according to guidance from California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing, the employer could speak with employees or send an email or other written communication stating:

[Employer] has learned that an employee at [office location] tested positive for the COVID-19 virus. The employee received positive results of this test on [date]. This email is to notify you that you have potentially been exposed to COVID-19 and you should contact your local public health department for guidance and any possible actions to take based on individual circumstances.

Other than communicating the positive test result, employers may not, however, discuss the infected employee’s health status with other employees. The employer must maintain strict confidentiality of the infected employee’s name and health condition.

Maintain a Clean, Safe & Healthy Workplace

Employers must be complying with all safety and health regulations, including as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and its Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19. This may include closing a location known to have been infected, if necessary, for proper cleaning and disinfecting. The CDC recommends waiting up to 24 hours before beginning cleaning and disinfection.

Essential Workers: The CDC has issued relaxed guidelines for critical infrastructure workers, as previously defined by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, who have been potentially exposed to COVID-19. Under the relaxed guidelines, essential workers potentially exposed to COVID-19 may continue to work following exposure provided they remain symptom-free and employers implement precautions to protect the employee and the community (e.g., pre-screen, regular monitoring, wearing a mask, social distancing, and routinely disinfecting and cleaning work spaces).

If your employer is not following the above precautions and/or the workplace is objectively unsafe or unhealthy, and your employer is nevertheless forcing you to report to work, it could be in violation of OSHA and California’s labor laws, such as Labor Code §§6400, 6402 (“No employer shall require, or permit any employee to go or be in any employment or place of employment which is not safe and healthful”).

If you feel your employer is forcing you to work in an unsafe or unhealthy workplace, contact attorneys at Haeggquist & Eck, LLP to learn more about your rights.

To schedule your free initial consultation, contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 today!

Before COVID-19, My Employer Claimed It Could Not Accommodate My Disability- or Pregnancy-Related Request To Work from Home. Now Everyone Works from Home. What Gives?

Long before the COVID-19 pandemic forced many businesses to implement teleworking, employers were required to provide such accommodations to its disabled and pregnancy-disabled employees so long as it did not impose an “undue hardship” on the employer. Unfortunately, some employers have been too quick to deny such a request from its disabled employees in the past, which begs the question – why was it so easy for them to implement teleworking for their able-bodied employees? And if it could suddenly implement teleworking for its entire workforce, what other accommodations has it been wrongfully denying? These employers could potentially be liable for their failures to accommodate their disabled employees.

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees with actual or perceived physical or mental disabilities, including pregnancy-related disabilities. Furthermore, employers have an affirmative duty to provide reasonable accommodations for the known disabilities of its employees and to engage in an interactive process with employees to determine what accommodations are needed and which can be provided. An employer may only deny requested accommodations if it would require significant difficulty or expense. Going forward, it is going to be much more difficult for employers to deny accommodation requests from disabled employees.

What is a Disability under FEHA?

Disabilities are broadly defined under FEHA and include:

  • Any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as an intellectual disability, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disability, that makes a major life activity, such as working, more difficult to achieve; or
  • Any physiological disease, disorder, or condition that affects a bodily system such as neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine, and makes a major life activity, such as working, more difficult to achieve; or
  • Any condition related to pregnancy or childbirth, or a related medical condition if, in the opinion of her health care provider, the condition makes the person unable to perform any of the essential functions of her job without undue risk to herself, to her pregnancy’s successful completion, or to other persons.

Examples of physical disabilities include deafness, blindness, partially or completely missing limbs, mobility impairments, cerebral palsy, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, epilepsy, seizure disorder, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and heart and circulatory disease. Examples of mental disabilities include autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, clinical depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Examples of pregnancy disabilities

include severe morning sickness, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, post-partum depression, childbirth, loss or end of pregnancy, and recovery from childbirth, loss or end of pregnancy.

Disability does not, however, include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or substance abuse disorders and typically does not cover mild conditions such as the common cold, seasonal or common flu, minor cuts, sprains, muscle aches, soreness, bruises, or abrasions, non-migraine headaches, and minor and non-chronic gastrointestinal disorders.

What Must An Employer Do To Accommodate Disabled Employees?

Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations for the known disabilities of their employees. Essentially, a reasonable accommodation is any change to the work environment or to the way a job is typically done that will enable a disabled employee to perform the essential functions of their job. Employers must consider any and all accommodations that it is aware of or that are brought to its attention by the applicant or employee. Examples of accommodations include:

  • Teleworking;
  • Leaves of absences, even after all protected leave has been exhausted;
  • Modified work schedules or offering part-time work;
  • Acquiring or modifying equipment or devices and providing assistive aids such as qualified readers or interpreters;
  • Making existing facilities readily accessible;
  • Allowing assistive animals;
  • Transferring to a vacant position or a more accessible worksite;
  • Job restructuring such as reallocation or redistribution of certain job functions and altering when or how certain job functions are performed;
  • Adjusting or modifying examinations, trainings, policies, or supervisory methods; and
  • Providing additional training.

Additionally, for pregnancy-disabled employees, accommodations may also include permitting more frequent breaks, providing furniture (e.g., stools or chairs), providing a reasonable amount of break time and use of a room or other location close to the employee’s work area to lactate in private, and temporary reassignment to a less strenuous or hazardous position or to less strenuous or hazardous duties. Employers are not, however, required to eliminate any essential job duties, lower quality or quantity standards, or create new positions for disabled employees.

Employers may only deny a disabled employee’s accommodation request if the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer. But before an employer can do so, it must first engage in an interactive process with the employee.

What is the Interactive Process?

The interactive process is an individualized assessment of the job at issue and the specific disability-related limitations of the employee that are directly related to the need for accommodation. An employer is required to initiate the interactive process if an employee with a known disability requests accommodations, the employer otherwise becomes aware of the employee’s need for an accommodation through a third party or by observation, or the employer becomes aware of the possible need for an accommodation because the employee with a disability has exhausted all available leave.

The interactive process must be in good faith and timely. The employer must either grant the accommodation request or reject it after due consideration and discuss possible alternatives. This involves identifying potential accommodations and assessing the effectiveness each would have in enabling the employee to perform the essential function of their job. An employer may request medical documentation to support the need for accommodation, though it may not ask about the underlying medical cause of the disability. An employer may also request clarification of medical documentation and consult experts.

In the end, an employer may only deny an accommodation if, after engaging in this interactive process, it determines that the requested accommodation would impose an “undue hardship” – meaning the accommodation would require significant difficulty or expense considering factors such as the availability of tax credits and deductions and/or outside funding, the overall financial resources of the company, the number of employees and number, type, and location of its facilities, and the impact on operations. This is a very high burden to prove.

What To Do if You Believe Your Rights are Being Violated

It is important to know that your employer cannot discriminate against you based on your disability, including pregnancy, and cannot retaliate against you for requesting disability-related accommodations. If you are disabled and believe your employer has violated your rights, you may be able to hold them legally accountable. The employment law attorneys of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP will work with you to learn about your situation and seek fair and just compensation if your employer is breaking the law. Contact us online or call (619) 342-8000 to learn more about how we may be able to support your claim.

What Are the Limitations To At-Will Employment in California?

You’ve probably heard of at-will employment before. Maybe you saw it as a clause in your employment agreement, or maybe it came up at a time when you were fired or laid off by an employer. In a nutshell, it’s the concept that your employer (or you) can terminate your employment at any time and for any reason or no reason at all.

At-will employment is widely acknowledged and used throughout the United States – so widely, in fact, that only Montana doesn’t recognize it. The basic reason for its existence is to keep employees and employers free from an undesired obligation to work for or employ another party.

Although the presumption in California is that all employment is at-will, there are exceptions.

At-will employment in California is limited by the following:

  • Federal and state employment laws
  • Implied contracts
  • Covenants of good faith and fair dealing

If an ostensibly at-will termination is made for any reason that runs counter to these factors, employees may be able to recover compensation by filing a wrongful termination lawsuit. Let’s take a look at how each of these affects at-will employment.

Federal & State Employment Laws

Even if employment is at-will, an employer’s motivation to terminate cannot be based on an illegal factor. In other words, an employer cannot fire an employee for an illegal reason and attempt to claim that at-will employment protects the decision.

“Any reason” does not protect illegal reasons.

Californians enjoy many protections at work that safeguard protected classes (age, sex, race, religion, skin color, gender identity, and others) from discrimination and retaliation when they report unlawful behavior. An employer would therefore be incorrect in assuming they are protected by at-will employment for firing someone who requested a reasonable accommodation for their disability or for firing a female employee after she reported sexual harassment.

Implied Contracts

Employees may be protected against at-will employment if an implied contract is created between an employee and employer that leads the employee to believe termination at-will would not occur. The implied contract can be written or oral and there is no requirement for a written overarching employment contract to exist for an implied contract to also exist.

If an employee is led to believe through company manuals or conversations with managers that he or she would not be terminated without prior notice, a certain number of warnings, or any other circumstances, an implied contract may be in effect and can be enforced.

Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing

California is among the few states that recognize another important limitation to at-will employment: the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. While not explicitly an employment protection, this legal mechanism permits grounds for plaintiffs to sue when decisions by the other party in a legally binding contract are made in bad faith, arbitrarily, or maliciously.

Like an implied contract, this isn’t exactly easy to prove in a lawsuit because there aren’t any clear statutes to back up a claim. That said, employees who were arbitrarily let go or fired by an employer who explicitly sought to cause them financial harm can argue there was a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Were You Fired At-Will?

Employers who fire or lay off their employees are quick to reference at-will employment clauses in their contracts. Regardless of at-will employment, “any reason or no reason at all” is not the case when an employee is being fired for an illegal reason or in violation of an implied contract or the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

If you believe you were wrongfully terminated and want to seek legal action against your employer, reach out to the employment law attorneys at Haeggquist & Eck, LLP for help. We offer free consultations to all prospective clients so we can help you assess the validity of your claim and options for taking legal action.

Contact us online or by calling (619) 342-8000 to schedule your free consultation today.

Translate »