April 30, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
San Diego, April 30, 2010 āĀ Haeggquist & Eck, LLP,Ā and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLPĀ on April 30, 2010, filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit against Trump University, on behalf of consumers who purchased Trump University real estate investing seminars.
Trump University markets itself as a University driven by the mission to ātrain, educate and mentor entrepreneurs on achieving financial independence through real estate investing.ā It is anything but. Indeed, in January 2010, the Better Business Bureau gave Trump University a D-minus rating, and the New York Department of Education recently demanded that Trump University remove āUniversityā from its title, insisting that the āuse of the word āuniversityā by your corporation is misleading and violates New York Education Law and the Rules of the Board of Regents.ā
The class-action lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleges that Trump University made materially misleading misstatements in its advertising and in its real estate seminars, in violation of federal and state law. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff and class members who attended Trump Universityās real estate investing classes were promised a ācomplete real estate education,ā a āone-year apprenticeship,ā a one-on-one mentorship, practical and fail-safe real estate techniques, a āpower teamā consisting of real estate agents, lenders, personal finance managers, property managers and contractors, and were assured that although the seminars cost as much as $35,000, they would make the money back in their first real estate deal, and could make up to tens of thousands of dollars per month or more. Plaintiff and class members did not receive what they bargained for.
The Complaint alleges that instead of receiving a ācomplete real estate education,ā each seminar was merely an āinfomercialā to up-sell the student to purchase an additional Trump Seminar. The āone-year apprenticeshipā consumers were promised was actually just a 3-day seminar; the one-on-one year-long mentorship consisted of a 2-1/2 day excursion to view properties, and āmentorsā recommended real estate deals in which they stood to financially benefit, and then quickly disappeared and failed to return calls.
āOne of the most disturbing practices Trump University engaged in during these seminars was to tell students to raise their credit card limit ā4 timesā during the break, presumably to make real estate purchases,ā said Plaintiffās attorney, Amber Eck ofĀ Haeggquist & Eck, LLP. āIn fact, after students had raised their credit card limits, Trump University representatives told the students to use their newly increased credit limit ā not to purchase real estate ā but to purchase the next Trump āGoldā seminar ā for $35,000.ā
āItās really disappointing in this economy to see the lengths that Trump will go to play on the fears of seniors ā cajoling, āHow many of you lost a lot of your 401k investment in the market? How many of you are retired? How many of you want to leave a legacy or property to your kids?ā said Helen Zeldes of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP. āPraying on peopleās fears to sell them empty promises is not just wrong, itās illegal.ā
- May 25, 2011 ā CNN, āIs Trump University a Scam?ā
- May 7, 2011 ā Forbes, āTrump Universityās Unhappy Students.ā
- May 6, 2011 ā The Huffington Post, āTrumpās āUniversityā Accused of Scamming Customers.ā
- May 5, 2011 ā San Francisco Chronicle, āTrumpās Real Estate Courses Didnāt Deliver, Lawsuit Says.ā
- April 26, 2011 ā The Trump University lawsuit was featured on NPRās āThese Daysā with Alison St. John and KPBS Legal Analyst Dan Eaton.
- April 19, 2011 āĀ NBC Nightly NewsĀ airs a story on Donald Trump, mentioning Trump University.
- On October 12, 2010, the Southern District of California issued an Order upholding our first amended class action complaint against Trump University as to nearly all claims, including claims for breach of contract, false advertising, violation of Californiaās Unfair Competition Law (finding Plaintiffs stated a claim that Trump Universityās conduct was unlawful, unfair andā¦ fraudulent) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), with leave to amend as to the other claims. AĀ Second Amended ComplaintĀ was filed on December 16, 2010.
If you wish to discuss or participate in this action or have any questions concerning your rights or interests, pleaseĀ contactĀ plaintiffās counsel, Amber Eck atĀ (619) 342-8000Ā or clickĀ here.