Archives for September 2021

Common Forms of Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation

Under California law, it is illegal to discriminate against employees based on actual or perceived sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is a protected characteristic under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

In other words, your employer cannot discriminate against you because of your actual or perceived homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality. However, not all workers can recognize signs of workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.

For this reason, we decided to list some of the most common forms of discrimination based on sexual orientation. If your employer discriminated against you because of your sexual orientation, contact a San Diego discrimination lawyer. You likely have important legal rights that a lawyer can help you protect.

Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation is Illegal in California

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) prohibits employers from firing, refusing to hire, or in any other way discriminating against employees because of their sexual orientation (California Government Code § 12940).

Under the FEHA, it is also illegal for employers to harass employees because of their sexual orientation. To hold your employer liable for harassment based on sexual orientation, you must prove that the behavior was so severe or pervasive that it interfered with your ability to work (California Government Code § 12923).

Note: FEHA regulations apply to all companies that have five or more employees.

In addition, Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from firing, refusing to hire or promote, demoting, harassing, or otherwise discriminating against employees based on their gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation.

Thus, you can sue your employer and recover compensation if your employer discriminates against you because you are:

  • Bisexual
  • Asexual
  • Heterosexual
  • Straight
  • Gay
  • Lesbian

When filing a discrimination claim, it does not matter whether the sexual orientation is actual or perceived. In other words, you can sue your employer even if your employer is mistaken about your orientation or identity.

Common Forms of Sexual Orientation Discrimination

Under federal and California state law, it is illegal to discriminate against employees based on their sexual orientation.

Common forms of discrimination based on sexual orientation include:

  • Firing or terminating employment
  • Refusing to hire
  • Refusing to promote
  • Demoting
  • Denying a pay raise
  • Denying the benefits to which an employee is entitled
  • Denying reinstatement
  • Asking a prospective employee about sexual orientation during a job interview
  • Harassing an employee because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation
  • Denying an employee’s access to educational or training programs available to employees of a specific sexual orientation
  • Refusing to select an employee for a training program
  • Paying less because of a sexual orientation
  • Reducing an employee’s salary after learning about their orientation
  • Forcing an employee to quit voluntarily
  • Discharging an employee
  • Including discriminatory language in the conditions of employment
  • Assigning inferior job duties
  • Giving more desirable jobs to workers of a specific sexual orientation
  • Promoting workers of a specific sexual orientation
  • Providing reduced benefits
  • Issuing poor performance evaluations
  • Making disparaging comments or insulting an employee because of their sexual orientation
  • Retaliating against an employee for reporting discrimination at work, filing a complaint, or helping co-workers file a complaint
  • Discriminating against an employee in any other way

Employers cannot retaliate against employees for complaining about discrimination or harassment based on sexual orientation or any other protected characteristic. Retaliation is illegal in California, which means your employer cannot punish you or take adverse employment action against you for complaining about workplace discrimination or harassment.

If you believe that your employer has retaliated against you for exercising your rights, speak with a retaliation lawyer. The right employment attorney will review your unique situation and help you understand whether or not you can sue your employer for discriminating or retaliating against you.

What to Do if You Experience Discrimination Because of Your Sexual Orientation?

If you experience workplace discrimination based on your sexual orientation, file an internal complaint with help from your lawyer. When complaining about sexual orientation discrimination—or any other type of discrimination in the workplace, for that matter—follow your company’s internal procedure for filing complaints.

Usually, a victim of discrimination or harassment must file a formal complaint with the company’s human resources (H.R.) department. You will want a lawyer to fill out that complaint for you.

When filing a discrimination complaint, document all instances of workplace discrimination you can remember.

You should keep a journal and write down:

  • The date and time of each incident
  • The place (a specific area of the worksite) where the incident occurred
  • Whether anyone witnessed the incident
  • What makes you believe that you were harassed or discriminated against because of your sexual orientation

If your employer fails to take reasonable steps to correct the situation after receiving an internal complaint, you could proceed with filing a claim with California’s DFEH. Once your claim is received, the agency will launch an investigation into your complaint.

If the DFEH determines that the alleged discrimination took place after concluding its investigation, the agency will attempt to resolve the dispute through a settlement or file a civil lawsuit.

Note: In California, you have one year from the latest incident of discrimination to bring a claim with the DFEH.

Alternatively, you can also file a civil lawsuit against your employer for discrimination based on sexual orientation. Generally, California courts require plaintiffs in workplace discrimination cases to exhaust their administrative remedies before bringing a lawsuit against the employer.

Contact an Employment Discrimination Lawyer

Your discrimination lawyer may be able to help you obtain a right to sue your employer without having to go through the entire administrative process first. Speak with a knowledgeable attorney to determine your best course of action to hold your employer responsible for sexual orientation discrimination.

Never ignore workplace discrimination of any kind, including based on sexual orientation. Taking action not only helps you recover financially for what you experienced, but it also helps to prevent future instances of discrimination against other employees.

Proyecto de Ley en California Protégé a Trabajadores de Almacén de Cuotas Inseguras

El 8 de Septiembre 2021, el Senado de California paso AB 701, un proyecto de ley dirigido hacia proporcionar limitaciones a las empresas que les imponen cuotas de velocidad a los trabajadores de almacén en centros de distribución de almacén. 

El proposito del proyecto de ley es asegurarse que los empleados no sean requeridos a cumplir las cuotas que previenen el cumplimiento de períodos de comida o descanso, uso de baños o leyes de salud y seguridad ocupacional.

Si se firma como ley, ¿qué protecciones se requerirán?

El proyecto de ley requiere que los empleadores proporcionen una descripción por escrito de cada cuota a la que están sujetos los empleados, incluida la cantidad cuantificada de proyectos que se realizarán o materiales que se producirán o manipularán, y cualquier acción laboral adversa potencial que pudiera resultar de no cumplir con la cuota dentro de 30 días después de la contratación o dentro de los 30 días posteriores a la entrada en vigencia de la ley.

El proyecto de ley proporciona transparencia entre la empresa y el empleado en cuanto a los niveles de productividad esperada de cada empleado. Tambien évitara que las empresas despidan a sus empleados por no cumplir con cuotas poco realisticas que forzan a los empleados a comprometer su salud y seguridad para cumplir con las demandas de las empresas.

Empleados Tienen El Derecho a Solicitar y Revisar Cuotas

Bajo AB 701, si un empleado actual o anterior cree que cumplir con una cuota causó una violación de su derecho a una comida o un período de descanso o requirió que violaran cualquier ley o norma de salud y seguridad ocupacional, el empleado tiene el derecho de solicitar, y el empleador es requerido a proporcionar, una descripción por escrito de cada cuota a la que el empleado esta sujeto, al igual que una copia de los últimos 90 días de los datos personales de velocidad de trabajo del empleado.

Adémas, hay una presunción refutable de represalia si un empleador de cualquier manera discrimina, toma represalias, o toma alguna acción adversa contra cualquier empleado dentro de los 90 días de la empleado: 

(a) Solicitar al empleador que proporcione información sobre una cuota o datos personales de velocidad de trabajo; o

(b) Presentar una queja relacionada con una cuota alegando cualquier violación de la ley, ante el empleador, el comisionado, la división o la agencia gubernamental local o estatal.

Honorarios de Abogados

En particular, el proyecto de ley prevé los honorarios de los abogados para aquellos que busquen acciones legales de conformidad con AB 701, que crea acceso a la justicia para los empleados afectados.

Publicación de datos por el Comisionado Laboral 

Para el 1 de enero de 2023, el Comisionado Laboral debe reportar:

(1) el número de reclamos presentados ante el comisionado bajo este proyecto de ley,

(2) datos sobre cuotas de producción de almacén en almacenes donde las tasas anuales de lesiones de los empleados están por encima del promedio de la industria, y

(3) el número de investigaciones y acciones de ejecución iniciadas.

Si se convierte en ley, la AB 701 expondrá las cuotas de trabajo inseguras establecidas por empresas como Amazon y dará poder a los empleados que dependen de estos trabajos para mantener a sus familias y hasta ahora no han tenido otra alternativa que priorizar el cumplimiento de las cuotas sobre su propia seguridad.

Safer Federal Workforce Task Force Provides Guidance for Federal Contractors Pursuant to the Vaccine Mandate

On September 13, 2021, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force issued guidance pursuant to President Biden’s executive order on Ensuring Adequate Covid Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors.  

Which Federal Contractors are Subject to the Vaccine Mandate?  

The Vaccine Mandate applies to Federal contracts entered on or after October 15, 2021.  These contracts must have a provision agreeing to comply with all guidance for contractor or subcontractor workplace locations published by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force. Furthermore, executive departments and agencies will be required to ensure that these contracts contain a provision that the contractor and any subcontractors (at any tier) shall incorporate these provisions into lower-tier subcontracts.

The Contractor I Work for is Not Subject to the Federal Mandate. What rules apply to me?

If the federal contractor you work for is not subject to the federal vaccine mandate, you are still subject to the current safety protocols. 

The contractor is required to ask if you are vaccinated, and you must attest to the truthfulness of your response. If you disclose that you are not fully vaccinated or decline to say, the contractor is required to treat you as not fully vaccinated for purposes of implementing safety measures. 

Onsite contractor employees who are not fully vaccinated or decline to provide information about their vaccination status must provide proof of a negative COVID-19 test from no later than the previous 3 days before entering a federal building. However, if a contractor is regularly tested as part of an agency testing program, they do not need to provide proof of a negative COVID-19 test. 

California Bill Protects Warehouse Workers from Unsafe Quotas

On September 8, 2021, the California Senate passed AB 701, a bill aimed at providing limitations on companies that enforce speed quotas on warehouse workers in warehouse distribution centers. 

The purpose of the bill is to ensure that employees not be required to meet quotas that prevent compliance with meal or rest periods, use of bathroom facilities, or occupational health and safety laws. 

If Signed Into Law, What Protections Will Be Required?

The bill requires employers to provide a written description of each quota employees are subject to, including the quantified number of tasks to be performed or materials to be produced or handled, and any potential adverse employment action that could result from failure to meet the quota within 30 days of hiring or within 30 days after the law comes into effect. 

The bill provides transparency between the company and the employee as to the productivity levels expected of each employee. It will also prevent companies from terminating employees for failing to meet unrealistic quotas that force employees to compromise their health and safety to meet a company’s bottom line.

Employees Have the Right to Request and Review Quotas

Under AB 701, if a current or former employee believes that meeting a quota caused a violation of their right to a meal or rest period or required them to violate any occupational health and safety law or standard, they have the right to request, and the employer is required to provide, a written description of each quota to which the employee is subject, as well as a copy of the most recent 90 days of the employee’s personal work speed data.

In addition, there is a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employer in any manner discriminates, retaliates, or takes any adverse action against any employee within 90 days of the employee:

(a) Requesting the employer provide information about a quota or personal work speed data; or

(b) Making a complaint related to a quota alleging any violation the law, to the employer, commissioner, the division, or local or state governmental agency.

Attorney’s Fees 

Notably, the bill provides for attorneys’ fees for those who seek legal action pursuant to AB 701 which creates access to justice for affected employees. 

Publication of Data by the Labor Commissioner

By January 1, 2023, the Labor Commissioner is required to report: (1) the number of claims filed with the commissioner under this bill; (2) data on warehouse production quotas in warehouses where annual employee injury rates are above the industry average, and (3) the number of investigations and enforcement actions initiated.

If passed into law, AB 701 will expose unsafe work quotas set by companies like Amazon and give power to employees who depend on these jobs to provide for their families and until now have had no alternative but to prioritize quota compliance over their own safety.

How the Federal Vaccine Mandate May Affect You

UPDATE: The Federal Vaccine Mandate has been repealed as of January 13, 2022. Read here to learn more.

On September 9, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order that all federal employees and contractors who do business with the federal government must be vaccinated.

The vaccine mandate comes at the heels of the rise in COVID-19 cases the US has seen in the second half of 2021. President Biden issued this order to increase the number of vaccinated individuals and in return slow the spread of COVID-19. 

Who is Required to Get the Vaccine?

All persons employed by the federal government are required to be vaccinated subject to exemptions for employees with accommodations for disabilities, religious belief, or pregnancy. This includes members of the armed forces. 

I Work for a Government Contractor, Do I Have to be Vaccinated?

Generally, yes. The vaccine mandate applies to any individuals working on or in connection with a Federal Government contract or contract-like instrument in any workplace location in which an individual is working in connection with a contract, as specified by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force.

What if My Disability Prevents Me From Getting Vaccinated?

If your disability prevents you from getting vaccinated, you may seek an accommodation from your employer. Upon requesting an accommodation, you and your employer are required to engage in the interactive process. There, your employer is obligated to consider different options for you to be able to continue working. However, only accommodations that do not cause an undue hardship to the employer will be considered. Employers are not required to provide accommodations that cause a significant difficulty or expense to the employer.  

 

What if My Religion Prevents Me From Getting Vaccinated? 

Your employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it poses an undue hardship on the entity. Employers are to consider the same factors in providing a religious accommodation as they do for employees with disabilities.

Further, employers are required to assume your request for religious accommodation is based on a sincerely held belief. However, if your employer is aware of facts that provide an objective basis for questioning either the religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief, practice or observance, your employer is justified in requesting additional supporting information.  

What if My Pregnancy Prevents Me From Getting Vaccinated? 

Employees who are not vaccinated due to pregnancy are entitled to the same accommodations as those with disabilities and religious accommodations for the duration of their pregnancy. 

HAE Client “Dr. Nick” Yphantides Highlighted In Media Coverage Of Disability Discrimination Case Against San Diego County

Local and national media outlets covered our client Nick Yphantides’ case against the County of San Diego for disability discrimination, which was filed this week. Check out the coverage here:
The Daily Beast
San Diego Union-Tribune
Voice of San Diego
California News Times
KPBS
NBC 7
10 News
Fox 5
CBS 8
Patch/City News Service
KUSI
Bloomberg Law
Courthouse News Service
Translate »