California Judge Grants Emergency Stay, Uber & Lyft Back off from Shutdown Threats

Mere hours before rideshare hailing apps Uber and Lyft were willing to go dark in California over a judge’s order to classify its drivers as employees, an appellate court granted the companies a temporary reprieve from following the order.

And so, the rides continued – along with the companies’ refusal to consider rideshare drivers – who use Uber and Lyft’s apps to make money as de facto taxi drivers – as anything more than independent contractors. The status quo means the companies aren’t required to observe many important employment laws in California that would otherwise protect drivers’ rights to minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, paid sick leave, and worker’s compensation.

What spurred Uber and Lyft’s threats to cease service in California was an Aug. 10 injunction ordered by a California court that would have compelled the companies to begin reclassifying their drivers in the state as full employees by Aug. 21. At issue were lawsuits brought against the companies in May, alleging that they were violating AB-5 – a newly passed state law that adds a more stringent clarification as to what makes an independent contractor an independent contractor. As plaintiffs argued, rideshare drivers didn’t fit the bill.

The appellate court’s stay on the injunction, however, is contingent upon the companies prevailing in both their appeal and a ballot initiative to repeal AB-5 in November. By Sept. 4, the CEOS of both Uber and Lyft are required to submit to the appellate court a 30-day implementation plan to comply with AB-5 and reclassify their independent contractors as full-fledged employees.

Should the companies fail in their endeavors, however, it’s possible that many drivers who use the apps to generate extra income may be kicked off the app as a virtual form of at-will termination. It’s also possible that Uber and Lyft may just make do on their original threats to cease service in California and even move their headquarters to states they deem more friendly to their business models.

Do You Need Legal Assistance?

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP fights for workers when their employment rights are violated. If you are currently classified as an independent contractor and believe you should be reclassified under the provisions of AB-5, we can help you fight for what you deserve.

Our employment law attorneys can help clients like you recover fair and just compensation in damages against your employer in a successful lawsuit. Learn more about how we can assist you and if an experience attorney believes you may have a valid claim by reaching out to us for a free consultation.

Take advantage of this complimentary meeting with our attorneys by scheduling yours today. Call Haeggquist & Eck, LLP for help at (619) 342-8000 or fill out our online contact form to get in touch.

SHARE

COMMENTS & DISCUSSIONS

Related Posts

Class Action Suit Against SDSU

Haeggquist & Eck, LLP Title IX Clients Featured on ESPN for Class Action Suit Against SDSU

Haeggquist & Eck are proud to team up with Bailey Glasser to represent former and current SDSU athletes in their …

Read More
Screenshot_20210825-104602_Gallery

HAE Client “Dr. Nick” Yphantides Highlighted In Media Coverage Of Disability Discrimination Case Against San Diego County

Local and national media outlets covered our client Nick Yphantides’ case against the County of San Diego for disability discrimination, …

Read More
rideshare--driver

California Judge Rules Ballot Initiative Classifying App-Based Drivers As Independent Contractors Is Unconstitutional

Proposition 22, the controversial California ballot measure classifying app-based drivers as independent contractors, hit another roadblock on Friday after a …

Read More
Translate »